Prince Calypso
05-27-2013, 12:21 AM
So I've just gotten through watching Mermaids: A Body Found and Mermaids: The New Evidence
Anyone who knows me knows I am an avid believer in Mermaids and most other Mythical beast and creatures:)
Now I was just excited as the rest of you were, I'm sure,when Mermaids: a body found first aired, and even more when the New Evidence segment aired today
The Mockumentary is very well done and a very unique way of exploring The Aquatic Ape theory and the phenomena of the show has spread doubt throught even the most skeptical of people.
BUT, i have my issues with the entire thing and here's why
First of all as much as I am sure that mermaids aren't what they been depicted as throughout history in art and film and such
I do not like the depiction of these mermaids for one single reason
HAIR!:doh:
now i get the point that hair is heavy under water and blah blah blah but it kinda annoys me that they just annexed the hair entirely instead of simply finding a creative way to explain it.
All depictions of mermaids focus on the hair from Africa to Greece part of the mermaid allure. our ancestors weren't idiots people. superstitious and easily excitable but not stupid so if throughout history from culture to culture mermaids have been depicted with hair then why would our ancestors do so if when they saw the beings they didn't actually have hair or something which acted, behaved and resembled it? so making the mermaids bald was just lazy and stupid in my opinion.
my second issue is the CGI.:mad:
i get that there are lo. ts of things CGI lets you do but to me it's just lazy. if they wanted to make the show more realistic then i say they could have invested in silicone body molds and figures. now for the swimming and such yeah CGi but for still shots and such i think Figures and molds would have done so much better to get the idea of these creatures being real. like in the photo of The Real Mermaid owned by P.T Barnum. the creature in the tank in the picture is clearly a photo-shopped CGI image when they could have simply made a large silicone dummy or figurine.
Finally i was annoyed by the fact that they didn't dwell deeper into the Mermaid Myth and legend. There have been over a thousand stories of mermaids interacting with humans and even marrying them, why was this not explored?
there is also the fact that they hint that the mermaids have a nomadic culture and humanoid behavior but they don't dig deeper into this?
When Animal Planet did Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real, they explored all of these in far more depth than they did with Mermaids.
Other then these few things I love the Mockumentary.
the appearance and features of the mermaids are believable and well thought out (all except the lack of hair)
the wide paddle like tail is freaking epic and the eyes gah!
Then there's the Bloop
I do believe that the bloop is real and the reason behind it may just be mermaids. to me it was just kinda suspicious the the navy and stuff were so quick to say that they had never seen mermaids. and the wording they used "aquatic humanoid." that seems kinda weird. if they weren't taking it seriously then why use just a serious term for mermaid. The sighting of mermaids i beleive are true as well. I mean the whole mermaid thing in that one country was on the news way before this Mockumentary as were several other sightings and stories.
So even though I don't agree with the description of the mermaids physical appearance i do believe that the story line and research are reliable and could be true
Anyone who knows me knows I am an avid believer in Mermaids and most other Mythical beast and creatures:)
Now I was just excited as the rest of you were, I'm sure,when Mermaids: a body found first aired, and even more when the New Evidence segment aired today
The Mockumentary is very well done and a very unique way of exploring The Aquatic Ape theory and the phenomena of the show has spread doubt throught even the most skeptical of people.
BUT, i have my issues with the entire thing and here's why
First of all as much as I am sure that mermaids aren't what they been depicted as throughout history in art and film and such
I do not like the depiction of these mermaids for one single reason
HAIR!:doh:
now i get the point that hair is heavy under water and blah blah blah but it kinda annoys me that they just annexed the hair entirely instead of simply finding a creative way to explain it.
All depictions of mermaids focus on the hair from Africa to Greece part of the mermaid allure. our ancestors weren't idiots people. superstitious and easily excitable but not stupid so if throughout history from culture to culture mermaids have been depicted with hair then why would our ancestors do so if when they saw the beings they didn't actually have hair or something which acted, behaved and resembled it? so making the mermaids bald was just lazy and stupid in my opinion.
my second issue is the CGI.:mad:
i get that there are lo. ts of things CGI lets you do but to me it's just lazy. if they wanted to make the show more realistic then i say they could have invested in silicone body molds and figures. now for the swimming and such yeah CGi but for still shots and such i think Figures and molds would have done so much better to get the idea of these creatures being real. like in the photo of The Real Mermaid owned by P.T Barnum. the creature in the tank in the picture is clearly a photo-shopped CGI image when they could have simply made a large silicone dummy or figurine.
Finally i was annoyed by the fact that they didn't dwell deeper into the Mermaid Myth and legend. There have been over a thousand stories of mermaids interacting with humans and even marrying them, why was this not explored?
there is also the fact that they hint that the mermaids have a nomadic culture and humanoid behavior but they don't dig deeper into this?
When Animal Planet did Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real, they explored all of these in far more depth than they did with Mermaids.
Other then these few things I love the Mockumentary.
the appearance and features of the mermaids are believable and well thought out (all except the lack of hair)
the wide paddle like tail is freaking epic and the eyes gah!
Then there's the Bloop
I do believe that the bloop is real and the reason behind it may just be mermaids. to me it was just kinda suspicious the the navy and stuff were so quick to say that they had never seen mermaids. and the wording they used "aquatic humanoid." that seems kinda weird. if they weren't taking it seriously then why use just a serious term for mermaid. The sighting of mermaids i beleive are true as well. I mean the whole mermaid thing in that one country was on the news way before this Mockumentary as were several other sightings and stories.
So even though I don't agree with the description of the mermaids physical appearance i do believe that the story line and research are reliable and could be true